Sessoms v. Runnels, 08-17790 (2011)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Number: 08-17790
Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 15, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: FILED FOR PUBLICATION DEC 15 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT TIO DINERO SESSOMS, No. 08-17790 Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:05-cv-01221-JAM-GGH v. ORDER D. L. RUNNELS, Respondent - Appellee. KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or t
Summary: FILED FOR PUBLICATION DEC 15 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT TIO DINERO SESSOMS, No. 08-17790 Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:05-cv-01221-JAM-GGH v. ORDER D. L. RUNNELS, Respondent - Appellee. KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to..
More
FILED FOR PUBLICATION DEC 15 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT TIO DINERO SESSOMS, No. 08-17790 Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:05-cv-01221-JAM-GGH v. ORDER D. L. RUNNELS, Respondent - Appellee. KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Source: CourtListener
